Navteq Ln735 Map Update

Pedagogy .. Which ideology meets this criterion? What is your foundation?

The pedagogy is said emancipated from philosophy, but forget that anything to do with the human, with its training and its historicity, it has to do with philosophy or part of it. "What can philosophers tell us about issues that affect man? Among these problems, the central and dominant is just the man himself, that is its function, its nature and its destiny. " Not so little.

ideologies, whether of a religious and political, and cultural concern of the time, have influenced teaching practice and this, in turn, èriconosciuta within in one or another philosophical paradigm. Today, few 'trainers' can recognize the epistemic perspective in which they operate, and the debates around pedagogy certainly do not help them in their work. Falls ideologies, there has been a change of scenery also of educational processes. No to a Catholic education and not to a secular education. No obsession of secular values \u200b\u200band not to a technicality where what matters is not the content is transmitted, but the way it is transmitted.

Postmodernity, heir to the disappearance of being, emphasizing the subject, paradoxically lost the chance to say something about basic human traits. Of course we go to school, but people are educated? If education and education, no longer identify, nevertheless there is a child or adolescent in-person training. If there was not a subject, there is not a pedagogy. The features of pedagogy are then modulated by the definition of the subject that you recognize. And that is historically located, as well as teaching implemented. Pedagogy and didactics then come to identify themselves as "the theory and methodology of the educational experience, inside and outside the school, which like it or not can be recognized within a philosophical thought.

what about the 'preparation' for young people? How often complain about the teachers and professors of all kinds can, young people today are unprepared. Multiply courses, conferences and seminars on the teaching of the course, but the content? Education is entrusted to a modern education, but this is not without contradictions. These contradictions are well highlighted in the analysis of the education system currently operated by Paola Mastrocola. I point out a few.

The main contradiction is that while the reforms introduce new technologies to prepare young people to enter the world of work, which is a competitive world, they actually come to us to be unprepared in terms of cultural background, both the psychological baggage needed to address the competition. Indeed, if we are to encourage everyone, if the school is reduced to a playground, where you will find the resources to cope and helped not only to compare to others?
If you teach a subject such as letters or philosophy has become an option because the hours are fewer, and in these hours are asked to devote time to road safety education, sex education, prevention of drug use, hours for a healthy diet, learning to surf the internet and burn CDs, and then trips, museums, reading newspapers etc.., where does it go classical culture? In his spare time. Of course they will say that the school has changed, has to go up with the times, must evolve and adapt.

"The school is the school that adapts that does not lecture, but brainstorming and educational tours, no ball, but recovers, will not, but it offers, does not follow the programs, but routes, not makes literature, but communication is not asking the subject, but the newspaper article, does not provide content, but methods, no life and works, but the analysis of the text, does not require books to read, but let me choose. Avoid the pupil: the frustration of the white paper, the humiliation of having a wise professor, the effort to learn the concepts, the embarrassment to take 4 report card, the commitment to make things difficult, and the boredom of reading a book too long. We want our children-students are: not frustrated, not humiliated, not tired, not embarrassed, not engaged, not bored. We want to be: integrated, socialized, promoted, amused, relieved, comforted, helped, listened, recovered, filled, smiling, a little-making. "

"Tessa them, day by day, reform after reform, a dangerous network, a fraud, a death trap: this school easy, sociable, fun, flexible, adequate, modern, innovative, computerized, relief, permissive , open ... this school is not punitive, not rewarding, not on merit, not boring, not difficult, demanding ... this school car park, kindergarten, community center, Club Méditerranée, this school of grids and projects, courses and modules , objectives and strategies ... this school that we are now building their possibly ruin them. "

And some are already seeing results, I refer to by many young people complained of difficulties to write and speak correctly in Italian. They know something university professors complain that the phenomenon for some time, and confirm that "some active faculty in the first year of actual writing courses, where he teaches everything dall'ortografia up the art of logical analysis' argument. But the problem is very serious: they skipped the logical patterns of thought, therefore, there is an absolute inability to build any structure and discourse, oral and written. "

"None of the rewards or school values \u200b\u200bthe best. The whole structure of training, indeed, is now designed specifically and only for pupils who have difficulties in the study. The complex web-hosting-recovery due to be closed is in fact a giant 'plan' strategy to facilitate young people in trouble, the logic of a school aid. Our school is a caring, where the dominant message is: we take care to go on everyone, without distinction as possible. "

Which ideology meets this criterion? What is your foundation?