As you get to find intolerably harmful separation between politics and society? What is the point where a necessary distinction of tasks, functions, perspectives, skills becomes radical opposition of interest, clearly felt, even before the great majority of the population policy by those who live as a source of income, as well as recognition of personal identity, of power in everyday life? It is obviously difficult to say when the feeling of estrangement between the two circuits of discourses, practices and discourses are creating too many interests at stake and not always transparent, or to one side or the other of this strange juxtaposition. But it seems hard to deny that again, in Italy, even after the controversy of Pasolini on the distance between the real country and Palace in the early seventies and after the traumatic revelation of Tangentopoli, we are facing a gap between those who live and work in society civil and public institutions on the one hand, and those living and working in the sphere of politics.
It broke again the balance, always delicate and unstable in a democracy, between those who produce material wealth, knowledge and services and those who - for their profession - should interpret the speech as well as the needs and unexpressed desires of society. At a time when the channel stops, the movement of people and ideas is stopped, the ranks of political opening and extend only co-opted and become largely impervious to the guidelines of the company, then the cost of the general perception in politics is too high .
So it was in the early seventies when the two referendum proved that politicians "are as far away as the moon," as claimed Pasolini, so it was when they removed the shaft system tangentizio.
The cast drawn from Rizzo and Stella does not say anything that you do not already know, but the system in a summary table of the numbers split between two systems that are struggling to speak, the disconnect between those who must speak and speak and who should listen and understand to create projects that make up the policy.
not listen and not understand, it seems, is the fault prior to accumulate chips present themselves, wives, children, friends and relatives on the boards of municipal and enables high levels of institutional cynicism.
The accumulation of privileges and positions of profit is possible only in the silence of society and its forms of manifestation. But is it enough to denounce this disease only to find remedies such as separation and start, or restart, the communication between professional politicians and society in general to ensure the correct ratios and predators? Certainly not.
voluntary responses that promise to "want" to reduce the costs of politics are just as vain as the only way externally adjustable. There are issues from which we can build mechanisms of interaction between society and in public policy to make the distinction of functions reasonably well, and discourage the creation of positions of privilege resonant and unassailable.
Access to public forms of discussion is the key to mend the separation and to bring politics as part of society in all its manifestations. Broaden the debate can trigger the self-reform of politics and society.
Un punto che non è stato a sufficienza sottolineato è che anche, forse in primo luogo, la separazione tra politica e società è da ricondurre alla debolezza in Italia di una riflessione ampia su che cosa sia diventata la società italiana dopo le grandi trasformazioni degli anni Novanta, nel sistema produttivo, nella cultura diffusa dalla televisione, nella percezione dei fenomeni migratori, nelle identità di luogo, di collocazione sociale, di credo religioso.
L’impressionismo giornalistico della carta stampata e televisivo è sporadico, spesso subalterno agli avvenimenti of record, and fails to produce a credible image. Not knowing who is not able to draw a credible profile, the Italian company fails to deliver a policy task. Above all is enveloped in the logic of short-term measures that are the stuff of which political action is made, including appeals to the strike which smuggle tax for general inquiries arrogance of those who are small groups.
You must create the opportunity to say who you are, what we want and what future they want for themselves and for generations to come to most possible proportion of those living in Italy, and lengthen the chain of cultural mediation to those who did not (or no longer, in some cases) any political representation.
of anti The temptation is illusory and deceptive because it denies the very central problem: to understand what is and what the future requires the company into its components, even those who have more difficulty in presenting themselves as legitimate political vision of producing .
0 comments:
Post a Comment