
Con il Medioevo la filosofia assume la connotazione di ‘arte liberale’ per eccellenza. La paidéia è organizzata dalle sette arti liberali apprese nel Trivio (grammatica, retorica, dialettica) e nel Quadrivio (aritmetica, geometria, astronomia, musica). Il fine è la preparazione dell’uomo ai doveri religiosi e alla vita ultra-mondana. La filosofia diventa allora ancilla theologiae, dimostrazione della verità della fede; la chiave d’accesso alle verità rivelate. In tale periodo, nel concetto di educazione ritroviamo un carattere aristocratico e contemplativo, tipici anche dell’età precedente, ma qui scompare l’aspetto naturalistico.
Durante il Rinascimento la religione diventa elemento integrante dell’educazione, non tanto perché ci prepara ad un'altra vita, ma perché ci aiuta a vivere bene ora, nella nostra vita. Viene recuperato così l’aspetto naturalistico; l’educazione mira a far vivere bene l’uomo nel suo mondo. Si assiste al ritorno dei valori della civiltà greco-romana, ma più che sul carattere contemplative, the emphasis is on the active character of the "wisdom", that man comes to be realized through the wisdom, and this is still reserved for aristocrats.
Enlightenment (Philosophie des lumières) becomes manifest hostility to the tradition, believed to be a source of prejudice and beliefs, and to the authorities. Every field of human experience is subject to the criticism of reason. Education is now being designed as an instrument of social and individual renewal. The culture is becoming universal and encyclopedic knowledge is enhanced ie new arts in the meantime had developed, such as physics, natural sciences, philology etc..
Enlightenment (Philosophie des lumières) becomes manifest hostility to the tradition, believed to be a source of prejudice and beliefs, and to the authorities. Every field of human experience is subject to the criticism of reason. Education is now being designed as an instrument of social and individual renewal. The culture is becoming universal and encyclopedic knowledge is enhanced ie new arts in the meantime had developed, such as physics, natural sciences, philology etc..
The multiplication of these different types of knowledge has not increased but the "knowledge", but has resulted in isolated, summary and specific knowledge, the result of positivist thought. The spiral of industrialization in fact implies that expertise is more specific and know more and more fragmented. The aim of education is adapting to a technical training which has as its goal the economic performance. Embarked on the road seems to dead end. I attempted to return to a conception antipositivistica of knowledge and education, namely the ideal of a formation that tends to the creation of man in his form or very nature, it seems paradoxical to exclude the man from his socio-historical context, but that does not mean that you feel a sense of 'non-fulfillment' of human nature.
0 comments:
Post a Comment